Facts
Why OpenAmartya Sen's entitlement-failure analysis holds the 1943 famine was a distributional and wartime policy failure rather than an absolute food shortage, while death toll estimates themselves range from 0.8 to 3.8 million, with Cormac O Grada putting scholarly consensus near 2.1 million; the atlas records both the mechanism and the count as unsettled rather than adopting one figure. 1 What Would ResolveA reconciled demographic reconstruction of wartime Bengal mortality that scholars broadly accept, and agreement on how much of the shortfall was genuine crop failure against wartime denial policy and market failure. 1 Discipline NeededEconomic history and historical demography 1 Open Question
Amartya Sen's entitlement-failure analysis holds the 1943 famine was a distributional and wartime policy failure rather than an absolute food shortage, while death toll estimates themselves range from 0.8 to 3.8 million, with Cormac O Grada putting scholarly consensus near 2.1 million; the atlas records both the mechanism and the count as unsettled rather than adopting one figure.
What would resolve this A reconciled demographic reconstruction of wartime Bengal mortality that scholars broadly accept, and agreement on how much of the shortfall was genuine crop failure against wartime denial policy and market failure.
OpenEconomic history and historical demographyAmartya Sen (Wikipedia)
Connections
Question On
Source Amartya Sen (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Amartya Sen (Wikipedia)
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.